When is an asset deal the best option?

A asset deal is optimal when buyers want to selectively acquire assets without historical liabilities, or when tax benefits from goodwill amortisation outweigh the complexity. For sellers, this structure often entails higher tax burdens and transaction costs, making timing and tax planning crucial to the final return.

What is the difference between an asset deal and a share deal?

At a asset deal the buyer purchases specific assets, such as the customer portfolio, stock, machinery, intellectual property and personnel. The company itself remains with the seller. In a share deal, the buyer purchases shares in the holding company or operating company, which means that the company remains legally unchanged and only the owner changes.

The fundamental difference lies in what is transferred. In a share deal, all assets and liabilities are automatically transferred, contracts remain in force and there is legal continuity. This makes this structure common among healthy SMEs where no selection of assets is desired.

An asset deal, on the other hand, requires more work in terms of contract transfer and permits, but offers buyers control over which elements they acquire. This structure is relevant in carve-outs or when buyers want to isolate specific parts of a company from potential hidden liabilities.

When does an asset deal offer the most advantages for buyers?

Buyers opt for an asset deal when they selective acquisition want specific business units, want to avoid hidden liabilities or want to realise tax benefits through a step-up. This structure offers maximum control over what is being acquired and protects against unknown risks.

Specific situations in which asset deals are preferable include companies with complex liability structures, companies in sectors with high regulatory risks, or transactions in which only certain divisions or product lines are relevant. This allows buyers to exclude problematic contracts, disputes, or obsolete assets from the transaction.

For strategic buyers who M&A As a growth strategy, an asset deal offers advantages in terms of integration. They can immediately incorporate the acquired assets into their existing structure, without the legal complexity of separate entities. This significantly accelerates the realisation of synergies and operational integration.

What tax benefits can asset deals offer?

Asset deals offer buyers a step-up to market value of acquired assets, including goodwill, which creates higher depreciation opportunities. This reduces future tax liabilities and improves cash flow, although transfer tax of 10.4% on real estate (2025) is a cost factor.

The step-up benefits are substantial in transactions where goodwill forms a significant part of the purchase price. Buyers can depreciate this goodwill over the period permitted for tax purposes, resulting in immediate tax savings. In share deals, buyers do not receive a step-up, which means that historical book values are maintained.

For sellers, the opposite applies: the entire profit is taxed at 19% or 25.8% corporation tax, without the possibility of a participation exemption. This asymmetry in tax treatment often makes asset deals more attractive to buyers than to sellers, which influences the dynamics of negotiations.

How does an asset deal affect the liability of purchasers?

An asset deal protects buyers against historical liabilities, because only specific assets are transferred and not the legal entity with its liabilities. Buyers only assume explicitly agreed liabilities, which significantly limits risks compared to share deals.

Legally, all non-transferred contracts, disputes, tax liabilities and other claims remain with the selling entity. This is crucial for companies with potential environmental liability, labour law disputes or uncertain tax positions. It allows buyers to limit their exposure to known, accepted risks.

However, an asset deal requires careful legal structuring to prevent certain obligations from automatically transferring. Employment contracts, supplier agreements and licences must be explicitly transferred or renegotiated, which increases the complexity of the transaction but provides legal certainty.

What are the disadvantages of an asset deal for sellers?

Sellers encounter a more complex tax treatment, because the entire profit is taxed without participation exemption, higher transaction costs due to contract restructuring and potential valuation challenges when splitting up business units.

The tax impact is substantial: whereas share deals often benefit from participation exemption (capital gains exempt), in asset deals the entire profit is taxed at corporation tax rates. This significantly reduces the net proceeds for sellers, especially in cases involving high goodwill components.

In addition, sellers are left with an empty company that may still have liabilities but no longer possesses any operational assets to cover them. This creates liquidation costs and potential liability risks, which increase the total transaction costs and can burden the seller for a long time.

What role does due diligence play in asset deal structuring?

Due diligence in asset deals requires a detailed analysis of individual assets, contracts and liabilities to determine what is and is not being transferred. This process is more complex than in share deals, as each component must be assessed and valued separately.

Specific points of attention include intellectual property rights, transferability of contracts, personnel obligations and hidden obligations that may still be included. Buyers must determine for each asset whether transfer is legally and practically possible without destroying value.

The acquisition strategy is directly influenced by the findings of due diligence. Discoveries can lead to adjustments in the selection of assets to be acquired, price renegotiation or additional guarantees. This makes due diligence in asset deals more time-consuming, but essential for successful transaction structuring.

Asset deals require a strategic balance between tax benefits, liability limitation and transaction complexity. Professional guidance in structuring and due diligence is crucial for optimal results. For advice on the right deal structure for your specific situation, please contact contact contact our specialists.

Share message:

Other knowledge articles

Resilience of food valuation levels

RELAY Corporate Finance has performed an in-depth analysis of European food multiples. This blog post will share the insights and ...

What does NIS2 mean for your organisation?

Impending NIS-2 legislation introduction accelerates existing M&A activity in cybersecurity market: an opportunity for growth and innovation Society and ...

RELAY strengthens deal processes with SINCERIUS

Relay Corporate Finance implements Business Insight by SINCERIUS, an innovative business intelligence tool. The BI tool is a product of ...

Trends in the Managed Services Sector

The Dutch ICT Managed Services sector continues to evolve. The most obvious trends are the increase in cloud adoption and ...

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from RELAY

Subscribe

We will call you back

Fill in your details below and we will get back to you as soon as possible!

Callback