The Dutch market for asset deals forms a substantial part of the broader M&A-landscape, whereby companies acquire specific assets and liabilities rather than shares. Asset deals offer buyers and sellers flexibility in transaction structuring, particularly in situations where risk management, tax optimisation or operational selectivity are key considerations. This type of transaction has specific legal and tax aspects that influence Dutch market dynamics.
What exactly are asset deals and how do they differ from share deals?
An asset deal is a transaction in which a buyer acquires specific assets and liabilities of a company without acquiring the legal entity itself. In a share deal, on the other hand, the buyer purchases the shares of the company, which automatically transfers all assets, liabilities and legal obligations.
The key difference lies in the selectivity of transfer. Asset deals enable buyers to acquire only the desired parts of the business, while undesirable liabilities remain with the selling entity. Share deals entail complete continuity of the business, including all historical liabilities.
Dutch entrepreneurs opt for asset deals when risk management is a priority. This structure prevents the transfer of unknown liabilities, tax disputes or legal proceedings. For sellers, an asset deal offers opportunities to retain certain assets or gradually phase them out.
The legal complexity varies considerably. Asset deals require individual transfer of contracts, licences and employment agreements. Share deals automatically retain all existing legal relationships, which is administratively simpler but entails more risks.
How large is the Dutch market for asset deals at present?
Asset deals represent approximately 30-40% of all Dutch mid-market transactions, with a clear concentration in sectors where operational selectivity and risk management are crucial. Market size fluctuates with economic cycles, with uncertain times often leading to more asset deal structures.
The retail, property and manufacturing sectors show the highest concentration of asset deals. In retail, asset deals facilitate acquisitions of retail properties and stock without staff or rental obligations. Real estate transactions often use asset structures to transfer specific properties without legal entities.
Recent trends show growing popularity of asset deals among merger– and restructuring processes. Private equity investors are increasingly using asset deals for buy-and-build strategies, whereby only core assets are acquired and integrated into existing platforms.
The average transaction value of asset deals is lower than that of share deals, as buyers operate selectively and often only acquire specific business units. This makes asset deals accessible to a broader group of strategic buyers and investors.
What advantages do asset deals offer buyers and sellers?
For buyers, an asset deal offers maximum risk management through selective acquisition of only desired assets and liabilities. Unknown liabilities, tax disputes and legal proceedings remain with the seller, which simplifies due diligence and limits acquisition risks.
Asset deals can be advantageous from a tax perspective due to depreciation options on acquired assets at market value. Buyers avoid transfer tax on real estate when it is part of a broader business acquisition, although anti-abuse rules apply to real estate companies.
Sellers retain flexibility through selective sales of business units. This enables them to continue core activities, retain certain assets or gradually phase them out. Asset deals also facilitate partial exits, whereby entrepreneurs gradually reduce their involvement.
Operationally, asset deals offer both parties integration benefits. Buyers can immediately integrate acquired assets into existing structures without complex legal restructuring. Sellers can concentrate on remaining activities without having to completely wind up their business.
What are the main challenges in asset deal transactions?
Contract transfer is the most complex aspect of asset deals. Supplier contracts, customer agreements and licences often require explicit consent from third parties for transfer. This process is time-consuming and can result in deal breakers when crucial contractual parties refuse to cooperate.
Staff transfers bring with them challenges in terms of employment law. Dutch legislation requires careful procedures to be followed when a business is transferred, whereby employment conditions and pension rights must remain guaranteed. Participation and consultation Employee representation requirements are mandatory and may delay the process.
Licences and certifications are often non-transferable and must be reapplied for. This applies in particular to regulated sectors such as financial services, healthcare and food production. The period between closing and obtaining a licence can threaten operational continuity.
Administrative separation of assets and liabilities requires thorough accounting and legal documentation. The distinction between transferred and retained elements must be crystal clear in order to prevent future disputes. This makes asset deals administratively more complex than share deals.
In which situations is an asset deal the best choice for your company?
Asset deals are optimal when risk management takes precedence over transactional simplicity. This applies to acquisitions of companies with complex liability structures, ongoing legal proceedings or uncertain tax positions. Buyers in regulated sectors often opt for asset deals to simplify regulatory approvals.
Strategic buyers who only want to integrate specific business units benefit from asset deal flexibility. For example, a manufacturing company that acquires a competitor can take over only the production assets and customer base, while real estate and personnel remain outside the transaction.
Asset deals are suitable for sellers in the event of partial exits or restructuring. Family businesses can retain their core activities while selling non-strategic divisions. This facilitates gradual succession and preserves entrepreneurship within the family.
In emergency situations such as bankruptcies or suspensions of payments, asset deals often offer the only viable takeoverstructure. Buyers can selectively acquire valuable assets without liability for historical debts, enabling the rescue of business operations.
How does the asset deal process work in practice?
The asset deal process begins with thorough inventory of assets and liabilities to be transferred. This phase takes 6-8 weeks and includes legal, tax and operational due diligence. Specific attention is paid to contractual transferability, licensing requirements and personnel matters.
Structuring and documentation follow completion of the due diligence. Asset purchase agreements are more complex than share purchase agreements because each asset and liability must be explicitly specified. Legal advisers draw up transfer deeds for real estate, intellectual property and other registered assets.
The preparatory phase prior to closing involves obtaining third-party consents, permit applications and staff consultation. This process takes 4-12 weeks depending on the number of contracting parties involved and regulatory requirements. Timely communication with all stakeholders is crucial.
Closing and post-closing activities finalise the transfer. On the closing date, all transfer deeds are executed and the purchase price is paid. Post-closing includes administrative separation, system migrations and operational integration. Professional guidance during this process maximises value creation and minimises implementation risks.
Asset deals require specialist expertise in legal, tax and operational matters. The complexity of these transactions makes professional guidance essential for successful execution within the set deadlines. For strategic decision-making on transaction structure and process optimisation, you can contact Contact us for an analysis of your specific situation.
Link copied!
